INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
TRACT HOUSE
With no physical boundaries to confine expansion, the Trac(t) House, like the city, integrates itself endlessly across previously uninhabited terrain. The house is located on existing railway tracks, a skeletal framework extruding from a flatbed rail car that traverses suburban, x-urban and rural landscapes. This conceptual project was submitted as part of an ideas competition on the ‘house of the future’. The approach explored a range of critical questions on contemporary culture including the ubiquitous monotony of suburban development as well as ideas around transit and transience, urban mobility and second nature.
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Jason Han, Han Chung
